Our Community is 940,000 Strong. Join Us.


s10 questions


Crazy Driver
04-13-2007, 01:02 PM
What are some pro's/con's of an s10?

I'm stuck between the Ranger and the s10.

Thanks for any help.

Jerseydevil1953
04-13-2007, 06:45 PM
Both Suck LOL:rofl:

Crazy Driver
04-13-2007, 08:46 PM
Or you can GTFO

rlith
04-13-2007, 08:50 PM
Knock it off please. I don't want to lock this thread.

ZL1power69
04-13-2007, 11:36 PM
flaming is not allowed hear :nono: so keep it clean. what year(s) of s10/ranger are you looking at?

Crazy Driver
04-14-2007, 10:52 AM
WTF?

He posted nonsense in my thread...I told him to get out since he wasnt helping.

As for years...s10 I've seen 1998's and years around there go for pretty cheap locally. [$2100]
Rangers I'm possibly looking for early 90's maybe even late 80's, which runs decent at a good price. ;)

recycle_me
04-15-2007, 09:21 AM
i have a 01 s-10 and love it. s-10 is easier to drop. though i havent done a 5 6 drop to a ranger so i cant be to insightful, but i do love my s-10.

ballinjefe22
04-16-2007, 06:44 PM
i'm assuming that you are wanting to use the truck for wheeling around. my cousin has owned both rigs...a 86 s10 and now he has an 84 ranger. i would say that the stock 2.8 and 2.9 engines lack power for serious mudding, but they both did alright climbing around in the woods. he was dumb enough to roll the s10 but the engine still lived, so we replaced a windshield, and popped the majority of the cab out so we could still fit. the 2.8 in the s10 had a knack for spinnin rod bearings in the number 5 or 6 rod. his engine eventually did it, and i have a 85 that did it, and the engine that i replaced into my 85 is starting to knock as well. i dont really know too much about the rangers engines, but i know i would rather have the 4 or 5 spd when wheeling. its a lot easier to control the power that you want that way. if you want more power, i would go for the newer s10 with the 4.3 or vortec 4.3. both suspension have decent flex but they are completely different. if you plan on doin a suspension lift you will be spending quite a bit more money on the s10 than the ranger. i ranger suspension is coil sprung (i think thats what its called, i really dotn remember) the s10 is independent. the s10 suspension rides a little better on bumpy terrain, but thats just about the only place i have noticed a difference. im not really sure if i can help with anything else. but if you are gonna go with an older rig, i would say they both are just about equal. the s10 i have has done everything that my cousins ranger has, and then some. the only reason i think i have gone farther than his is bc of the tires i have. anything else ya wanna know???

mrmikey
04-20-2007, 05:32 AM
I've got an '01 S-10 4.3 auto. Great truck, all kinds of get up and go, relatively smooth ride but gas mileage...there is none. I don't have a lead foot and I get an average 19 mpg and that's Canadian gallons not US.
I looked at a Ranger auto 3L that a fellow at work here just bought ('01) and believe it or not he gets the same.....Mike

Add your comment to this topic!