who has the fastest car (1/4 mile anyway) on the board?

We Do:D

41 Willy's Coupe...6.91

And that is a 1/4 mile time slip.:eek:

Any questions?

who has the fastest street legal car? both on and off slicks.

not me for christs sakes! My friends turbo beetle (old one!) runs mid 10's! on the bottle

On slicks I ran a 11.4 at over 120mph. The car was having some problems though, probably would have went 11.1 or maybe a 10.99. The ecu was kicking the rev limiter back to 6.5k rpm when it's normally 8.1k rpm. Killed the powerband bad. Shooting for mid to low 10's the beginning to mid season and 9's by the end. This is a street legal car that is driven everday, no trailor queen here. 00 honda civic coupe w/b18c1 turbo, full interior and a cage.

im guessing im running 16's or 17's cause i shift like shit and my car is slow and heavy (i think):bandit:

12.8 @ 110mph
Full street trim on daily tyres.
Hardly modified. (for now)

9.44 Hey quickchange...what you got powering that rocket?

Right now? About 8 minutes - thats the time it takes for me to push the damn thing down the 1/4 mile cause my car isnt working :flipa:

Originally posted by Scott 02
9.44 Hey quickchange...what you got powering that rocket?
your running 9's???? in what?

The baddest 65 Rambler in the world. :) I'll list the mods in a few. A buddy of mine been putting alot of time in it.

12.7 in the '79 with street tires (horrible traction)
12.8 in the ZR-1
14.5 in the 850

all of these are in the Louisiana summer...i.e. 95 degrees with 100 percent humidity

My time is here, you can check it out
http://www.automotiveforums.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?threadid=37618&perpage=15&pagenumber=2

Just from the observation, some people post their times/speed and dont have anything to back it up. Atleast post some mods being made, stats for car from some website, pix of car. Otherwise i can say my car was really fast too.

Update 12.1 Yes that is a red light on this particular run, missed a perfect light by .011 but was a great photo.

http://www.defy.net.nz/albums/album38/IMG_0916.sized.jpg

They are all stret legal, all but the roadmaster can handle "better than a zo6



01 WS6 11.012 @122 all motor
top speed 179
93 Zr1 surprise 11.567 @ 117
top speed 189
Spec v with my mod an Impressive 14.407 @ 97.5 mph
Top speed verified 146

with the suspension mods i've done personally it will outslalom a Zo6( my fav) but not out g not even close.89 vs 1.02

buthe others...hehehe it nice to have balance Danialson

Jepp turns an impressive 0-60 down from 9.8 to a stunning 6.9 gotta love Awd and torque in unison

Need to update some mods.. or hell just leave it hey yell at me for to many lines as is


hope you enjoyed floks..and these are mint and i mean 3733 mile Ws6
17,545 miles Zr1 20 K onthe roadmaster(94) and 2938 on the Jeep

The spec v has just under 7 k.. you can tell wich one are my dailys.. i split them up

Hope you enjoyed the program
collecting.. nothing better

to edit my above post no car aforemention use Nos/ SC/ TC

theWs6 and Zr1 are Nosequipped.. but i'm not a beleiver in non motor times.. though in reality the bottle stay in the garge unless there is a big money raace then i'll add 150 hp to each car and see whats up.. no no runs ever officially on the bottle.. a few on the Street for $5k

What mods do you have done to your cars?

Car not quite complete yet. Target: Mid 8's to setup the chasis. Then shooting for 7's with an "all motor" power plant. Possibly running a 500 shot of N20, unsure on this at the moment.

http://www.remleyracing.com/images/mustang.jpg

that car is beautiful:eek2:

Its awsome even though its a mustang.

Civic where do you live in Northern Virginia? I have yet to see a remotely fast Civic around here. I'm in Woodbridge/Dale City area.

Originally posted by DeViL
Civic where do you live in Northern Virginia? I have yet to see a remotely fast Civic around here. I'm in Woodbridge/Dale City area.


WHAT!!??? You're in NoVA? How long have you been there? I'm in Alexandria(when I'm not in school). We definitely have to hook up sometime. I can show you a BUNCH of fast Civics around here. My good friend Brett's SI runs 20+ lbs of boost and in the 10s. We do all the work for that car in my garage for the most part.

I'm in Fairfax, but most sat. nights you can find me in manassas on 28.

Self- This guy brett, he wouldn't happen to have a blue SI would he, body kit and some gram lights. If so, i met him sat. night up at maliks pizza. Clean looking car. Where has it run 10's at though, I never saw it last year at MIR.

Devil- are you the guy with the green T/A, custom plates.

Does this Green T/A happen to say 5.02Slow?? Thats not me but that guy always shows up at the car shows on friday nights. He has one of the early 90 model GTAs, :bloated:. I can't say that I like the look Pontiac went with when they tried to round off the front of the Firebird, but keep the boxy look of all the other 80's Firebirds.

yea, that's the guy i was thinking about. Well if you in manassas at all on sat. night's just look out for the 00 civic coupe with a black front bumper and a cage.

Haha how quick is that guy's Trans Am anyways?

not sure, i've tried to get him to bite when i've left manassas, but he never wants to play.

Originally posted by civicgsr_T4_60-1
I'm in Fairfax, but most sat. nights you can find me in manassas on 28.

Self- This guy brett, he wouldn't happen to have a blue SI would he, body kit and some gram lights. If so, i met him sat. night up at maliks pizza. Clean looking car. Where has it run 10's at though, I never saw it last year at MIR.

Devil- are you the guy with the green T/A, custom plates.

Brett does have a Blue SI, but that's not who you met. I think you met another guy I know, his name is Willy. He has a pretty quick SI too, but not like Brett's. I don't really know him all that well, only met him once or twice. Don't know what he run's. I don't know the guy with the T/A by the way. I used to go to Manassas occasionally(during summer, I'm at school otherwise). Would you happen to know Scott(green EX, stock looking), Sarah(dark green Accord, really clean looking), Lei(silver Prelude), Suwan(baby blue prelude with white rims and graphics, plates say lilude3 or somethin like that)...Any of those sounding familar? I know they went to Manassas a bunch, like every other weekend.

I find it amazing.. not that hond's and accura and varous 4 banger turbo/nitroused jpa mobiles are hittngin 10'' but they break halfshafts,, blow motors ,, haveguttud interior and ar barely what i consisder a car my 11 flat Ws6 9 untestes with the new head job or the small Nos shot) has a rear seat delete.plush leather.. 100 wattstereo power windows seats Automatic tranny and is a reall car. that ca handle with the same tires as it uses fro drag..( although notas well as the Victo 700).. its so damn easy to buil a one demensional car.. try mmaking it an a overall beast thts the trick.. staigh line acceleraton give me 5000 dollars and i'll put togeter a Pos that run 9's in a strain=ght line.. don't expect a date to get into it or anyone looking at it with envy

haha. My car has a full interior, a cage. Power everything. I still run 10's in my honda. Yes, i may have to use slicks, but so what. 10's out of a 4cylinder street legal car is alot. I don't use nitrous, haven't broken a damn thing and it's my daily driver. Oh yea, and the ladies love the car when i run open dp.

MY88 Honda Civic Renaissance Model Xperiment (CRX)


PROFORMANCE: 11.403@145 MPH
0-100 in 4.6 sec
350 hp @ 21 psi at the fly wheel (no nos)
750 hp @21psi at the fly wheel (with nos).

My 72 Nova 10.50's @126mph.
98 Tahoe 16.20@81 mph
01 S&H dragster 7.23@184mph

My quickest quarter mile time was 11.91 seconds @ just under 114 mph at Edmonton (2300 foot elevation) in 1995. On average the car ran in the 12-teen range (back then it was still considered fast, to have a 12 second street car). The car was a 1982 Mecury Capri (fox body) with a .030 over 302 Winsor, DART heads and a .224, .234 @ .050" lift camshaft, Performer RPM intake, a decent set of headers, and some pop-up pistons. Basically nothing too special. it was a 10.4:1 compression engine, so it ran on premium gas without problems. It weight 2850 lbs empty. I put an average of 20000 kilometers on it per year, and even drove it at -19 degrees Celcius once.

According to the Quarter Jr. programme, it had 330HP at the rear wheels. I thought it was ok for a reliable, fairly tame engine. Oh, and at 100km/h it got a mileage of 12L/100km (about 24mpg). Don't have any pictures here though. Left everything back home.:frown:

My deadly 1994 sunbird Le.

1/4 mile: probabley something like 19 seconds lol

0-60 : 12 seconds baby!

110 hp woo

MY88 Honda Civic Renaissance Model Xperiment (CRX)


PROFORMANCE: 11.403@145 MPH
0-100 in 4.6 sec
350 hp @ 21 psi at the fly wheel (no nos)
750 hp @21psi at the fly wheel (with nos).

0-100 in 4.6 seconds, how? then you must run the 1/8th in 4 and the 1/4 in about 7. take that stuff to www.hondahookup.com. send me a video or something, im not convinced. if it takes you 4.6 seconds to hit 100, why does it take you almost 7 more seconds to hit another 45 mph? something smells and i call it BS

My best now is a 13.629 @ 106.45.

Breakdown:

R/T : 0.716 (HORRID)
60' : 2.334 (ALSO horrid...)
1/8 : 9.009
MPH: 84.07
1/4 : 13.629
MPH: 106.45

No mods but a catback... yet.

2002 Z28

15.7 @ 2800ft.

1968 Pontiac Firebird 350HO all stock.
3.23's open rear and ST300 tranny
ST300 = Cheap powerglide wannabe. (1st 1.79 and 2nd 1.00)
215/70/R14
3660 Race weight, full tank of gas

Hoping for mid 13's with the new combo (still waiting transplant)

7004R + decent torque convertor
400 with medium sized cam (2801) headers and ported heads.
Posi Unit added
245/60/R14

If this new combo doesn't work I start changing rear gears.

Oh ya, everything done myself. (Well with dad)

1965 Mustang Fastback - Street tires - N/A - 12.9 @ 112 mph

The car is set up for road racing though.

not my car but drive it often, it is my father-in-laws but i helped with alot of the work
74 nova, 3365lbs w/ driver
BODY
'glass hood and trunk lid aluminum inner fender wells, painted 89 mazda mica metal red
INTERIOR
dakota digitals, painless wiring, pro seat fully adjustable racing seats
ENGINE
GEN VII 5O2 isky cam, keith black pistons, not sure of other internals, dart stage II heads ported polished, RPM air-gap with a 1,050 dominator electric fans and water pump
DRIVETRAIN
built to the hilt turbo 400, with gear vendors under/overdrive 4.56 in a gm 12 bolt shifted at 6350 rpm
PERFORMANC
RWHP 691@6200 rpm
after installing the 502 and new gears we drove 25 miles to the track, 90 degrees and ran a best 10.02 @ 139 mph before we were thrown out for no cage, with a little workwe expect mid 9s. the BEST thing about this car is it is street driven everyday and gets 16 mpg
if you dont have a gear vendors check it out it makes the 4.56s very streetable making them 3.23s this is amazing on street/strip cars
I FORGOT, THIS PASS WAS RUN ON BFG DRAG RADIALS295/50 16 AT 16 PSI

MY88 Honda Civic Renaissance Model Xperiment (CRX)


PROFORMANCE: 11.403@145 MPH
0-100 in 4.6 sec
350 hp @ 21 psi at the fly wheel (no nos)
750 hp @21psi at the fly wheel (with nos).

WHAT KIND OF JOKE IS THIS? 11.4@145? YOU CAN CLEARLY SEE BY THESE EVEN NUMBERS THESE ARE OUTRAGEOUS ESTIMATES AN EVEN 350 AND 750 HP? 400 HP OFF A SQUEEZE ON A CRX? LOL

haven't taken the spyder up there or the 68ltd, but when i had my 91 civic si, i ran 16 second flat, with the orginal motor(D16A6)!!

Car not quite complete yet. Target: Mid 8's to setup the chasis. Then shooting for 7's with an "all motor" power plant. Possibly running a 500 shot of N20, unsure on this at the moment.

http://www.remleyracing.com/images/mustang.jpg


What do you mean by a "all motor" power plant exactly?

What do you mean by a "all motor" power plant exactly?

:confused: that is your car and you dont know what all motor is?
anyway, all motor is when the engine is n/a (naturally aspirated) i.e. no nitrous, no supercharger, forced induction

http://images.cardomain.com/member_images/12/web/132000-132999/132873_112_full.jpg This will go 5.04 in the 1/8th, and does 1.21 60' time(it did in Cincy for the last street outlaw event of the season)
AEM sponsors this and it makes about 2K hp. That is a 101mm turbo with a 105mm throttle body flowing through a set of Yates heads on an SVO block. Car is full tube chassis and is 25e certified (to six second runs in the quarter) If you go to any Fun Ford events in '04 you will see it run there.
http://images.cardomain.com/member_images/12/web/132000-132999/132873_111_full.jpg

Hey! Another Ford Fox-body man. Cool! That turbocharger looks like it could fit on a Cummins ISX engine!

i would imagine a low 15 in my car :dunno:

who has the fastest street legal car? both on and off slicks.

You can find a copy of my 9sec time slip in my gallery. It is of my street legal toy which runs on pump gas not race fuel.

Mark

99 Silverado
14.20 @ 5200 ft+ (Bandimere Speedway, Colorado)
(Take off a second and you get about sea-level time)

14.20's are just the beginning, since I just sold my Vette and repurchased my baby. The SRT-10 convinced me that I needed to kick its ass.

9.82 @ 147 Best time to date. In humid Georgia summer on forced induction

12.33 on street tires.

1990 Mustang GT 11.3
1989 IrocZ 12.8
both on slicks using N2O
1990 GSXR11 9.89 street trim

11.5 is pretty high compression with nos.
I assume you only had a 50 or maybe 75 shot.

No I'm running a full 150 shot. Not without extensive precautions. I've seen it higher than mine too. It's all about tuning, plenty of fuel, plenty of spark, correct timing, enough octaine, and even cam specs. My block is o-ringed also to help keep the fire in the right spot. I use a rich/lean guage to keep tabs on my air/fuel ratio as well. No problems so far.

12.22@109mph on a bone stock v6 with bolt ons.hehe just a little psi and it goes pretty good. but that was a little while ago now the way my car sits it should run 11.50's@116-118mph.and i don't BS when it come to guessing times. any other BONE stock v6's running these #'s?? and i mean bone stock as in never opened up or moded the actual engine it's self.bolt ons is all i have.

Cody

V6 what?
nowhere in that post did you mention what car you had.
that's damn fast for a 6.

it's a 3.8L 231C.I v6 turbo.
87' TurboT/and i think i already said that it weighs 3700lbs!!
when i ran the 12.22 pass i had the stock turbo on it but now i have a fairly larger one on it.hehe right now it should be making 400ish HP @ 550ish Tq. last time i went to the Dyno i got 316Hp@3600 and 456Tq@3600. and i was only running 19psi of boost with the stocker but with my new turbo being more efficeint i can run 23-25psi of boost with no problem.hehe

Cody

I regret to inform you that a changr of 4-6 psi will not net 84 hp and 100 lb/ft.
also, no 300hp 3700lb car can do a 12.2
take parish's mustang for example, it weighs about 3300lb, has 500hp and got 1 sec faster.
and why the hell would you reach peak HP at 3600rpm??
according to your dyno.

[QUOTE]I regret to inform you that a changr of 4-6 psi will not net 84 hp and 100 lb/ft.
also, no 300hp 3700lb car can do a 12.2
take parish's mustang for example, it weighs about 3300lb, has 500hp and got 1 sec faster.
and why the hell would you reach peak HP at 3600rpm??
according to your dyno.QUOTE]

My 3000 pound (with driver) fox body Mustang ran 11.91 with 330 rear-wheel horsepower. A 3700 pond car would require roughly 370 horsepower to complete the quarter mile in 12.2 seconds @ 109 mph (providing that gearing, traction, shift points etc. were opitmised). Check out the "Quarter Junior" program. Perhaps the whopping torque figures offsets the relatively low HP figures on that comination, making 12.20's possible. None the less, horsepower is work/time and it takes a certain amount of power to accellerate 3700 pounds to 109 mph in 12.2 seconds. 316hp seems to be about 50 hp too low.

Also we must distinguish between rear wheel hp and flywheel horsepower.

BTW, peak horsepower at 3600 RPM doesn't surprise me too much on an otherwise stock 3.8 turbo six (although I would have guessed it to be a little higher - say 4200 RPM). Don't forget, the 3.8 is a low RPM motor. In stock trim, with stock valves and camshaft, they probably get valve float around 5000 RPM. But I'll bet it has 400 foot pounds of torque available at 2000 RPM. Cool engines. I always wanted to build a "copy" of a turbo 3.8 using a 302 Ford motor. Keeping head gaskets in that combination would have been the least of my problems. But that was 10 years ago. Maybe it's possible with after market fuel management systems and knock sensors.

3600 just seems awfully low to me.
and that ET is not possible without something like a 5.X rear end.

ok,MustangRoadRacer, the Dyno numbers do not lie and can't be that far off. it's a torque motor not a HP motor and Torque is all that counts when it comes to drag racing. Torque=good 60"=lower times,thus giving me a good 1/4mile time.and i shift at 4600-4800 so that proves to you that it's a low RPM Torque motor. and on the 12.22 pass i locked the converter to get the RPM's down to get more in the torque band.on that pass i got a 1.67 60".and i was only launching at 5psi. with a 8psi launch i should be high to mid 1.5X. and 1psi boost=10HP+ about 15Tq.BTW,locking my converter gives me an extra 30HP or so. you can take a 2 cars that are the same and stick a 300Hp@600Tq motor in it and take one that has 500HP@400Tq. the 600Tq motor will blow his doors off.

Cody

Well almost. To reach 109 mph in the quarter mile in a 3700 pound car you need a certain amount of power (regardless of your chice of measure: kilowatts or horsepower). Work/time is important here. Torque is simply a measure of work, not sufficient in calculating quarter mile performance. Sure cars with higher torque have a tendency to accellerate more quickly, as do cars with more horsepower. But torque alone isn't enough information, because it's a static figure, missing the variable of "rate".

Top speed at the end of a quarter mile run is the best indicator for rear wheel horsepower, providing we know the mass of the car (or weight, providing that we're drag racing on planet with gravity=9.81m/s²). It doesn't change much, even if the tration and gearing aren't optimal, up to a point (remember, we're not talking about 1000+ hosepower cars here).

Knowing that your car has 450 foot-pounds of torque at 3600 RPM is indeed sufficient information to calculate the horsepower at that exact RPM using the simple formula: horsepower=(torque)x(RPM)/5252

This will give us roughly 310 hosepower, however these hosepower are at exactly 3600 RPM. In order to do a quarter mile run at 109mph, you'll
need to have a few more horsepower, namely 370 (plus or minus a few percent). You'll find that your engine does indeed produce the above mentioned 370 HP (providing the information about your car's weight and mph at the end of the 1/4 mile are correct). Using the same formula, and assuming that your engine's torque doesn't drop off drastically above 3600 RPM, you'll find that your engine makes it's peak horsepower at about 4300 RPM.

None the less, the info you gave about 310HP and 450 foot pounds at 3600 RPM are quite believable and probably very accurate. Peak torque at 3600 RPM sounds right, but 3600 RPM is definately not where your engine makes it's peak horsepower, unless you have a substancial loss in torque above that RPM, thus making 109mph in the quarter mile impossible.

Put your car on a chassis dyno and you'll find it makes 370 horsepower at damned close to 4300 RPM at the rear wheels.

that is very good math you got there.i think the reason i got max HP at 3600 is cause the turbo spiked at 22 psi at spoolup and droped off to 19 throughout the run. and right at 3600rpm the turbo is spiked i beleive. but throughout the run my OTHER max HP was right around 4400rpm(you were very close)and around 310HP or so. but the car did max at 316HP. but these Dyno numbers were with my stock turbo and i have upgraded to a 49mm(Ta-49)Turbo and it;s max HP rating is 545 Vs. the stockers 360, and i think i max out my stock turbo. so with this new turbo it should produce 400+HP and 550+Torque. plus i have a new chip burned for 28* timing in 1-2 and 26* in 3rd and this timing change will give me a little more top end.so 11.50's@118mph is what i'm shooting for.should not be difficult at all.

Cody

ok.

Well almost. To reach 109 mph in the quarter mile in a 3700 pound car you need a certain amount of power (regardless of your chice of measure: kilowatts or horsepower). Work/time is important here. Torque is simply a measure of work, not sufficient in calculating quarter mile performance. Sure cars with higher torque have a tendency to accellerate more quickly, as do cars with more horsepower. But torque alone isn't enough information, because it's a static figure, missing the variable of "rate".

Top speed at the end of a quarter mile run is the best indicator for rear wheel horsepower, providing we know the mass of the car (or weight, providing that we're drag racing on planet with gravity=9.81m/s²). It doesn't change much, even if the tration and gearing aren't optimal, up to a point (remember, we're not talking about 1000+ hosepower cars here).

Knowing that your car has 450 foot-pounds of torque at 3600 RPM is indeed sufficient information to calculate the horsepower at that exact RPM using the simple formula: horsepower=(torque)x(RPM)/5252

This will give us roughly 310 hosepower, however these hosepower are at exactly 3600 RPM. In order to do a quarter mile run at 109mph, you'll
need to have a few more horsepower, namely 370 (plus or minus a few percent). You'll find that your engine does indeed produce the above mentioned 370 HP (providing the information about your car's weight and mph at the end of the 1/4 mile are correct). Using the same formula, and assuming that your engine's torque doesn't drop off drastically above 3600 RPM, you'll find that your engine makes it's peak horsepower at about 4300 RPM.

None the less, the info you gave about 310HP and 450 foot pounds at 3600 RPM are quite believable and probably very accurate. Peak torque at 3600 RPM sounds right, but 3600 RPM is definately not where your engine makes it's peak horsepower, unless you have a substancial loss in torque above that RPM, thus making 109mph in the quarter mile impossible.

Put your car on a chassis dyno and you'll find it makes 370 horsepower at damned close to 4300 RPM at the rear wheels.

I like your math, Im not saying that it is wrong but, Turbo buicks are goofy. I don't agree with his numbers, im not saying that, I'm just asying it's not uncommon to see a GN with like 400 HP and like 500+ ft-lbs of torque. I wish I could launch with 5 PSI on street tires. I can only launch at 2. However with the slicks I car launch at 10PSI.... Its fun

12.68@109 MPH with the only mods being 42# injectors, SMC Dual nozz alcohol kit. TE-60 turbo with 3" downpipe, Pump gas (93 octan) 24PSI

11.81@116 MPH with all the same stuff except slicks and 118 torco fuel. and 27PSI. Had to turn the alcohol off for 118 torco..... With that fuel it makes a cool 20' blue flame :evillol:


Did all this without a posi open rearend one wheel wonder.

It weighs 3690 LBS with me in it.

9.47 @ 144mph, 1/4mile, at 8800 corrected altitude.
1967 nova super gas, 2700# w/driver
509 bbc, small 310 dart pro 1heads, normal mods.
Havent had it to sea level yet, but hoping for 8.90s
we run a 10.53 super gas index in denver

69 RS Camaro, 11.96 at 111mph 1/4. Street tires and mufflers. NO NOS, just cast iron head 406 small block. Full interior and about 3100lbs. Drove it to the track and drove it home. My 70 Nova, 9.83 at 132mph. 434 small block. Fully tubbed rear end, fiberglass body panels but still weighs 3000lbs. Ran Super Street at many NHRA races and winning my shares of Wally's.

Hey Super Gas, if I had a 509 that didnt go any quicker than 9.47, I would put that motor in my TOW vehicle. I dont care if it was at 8000 ft. 2700lbs is kinda heavy but thats alot of cubes. We have 500 cube fellas around here running 8.50 and 8.60s in super gas trim. You might want to go Small Block and make things interesting.

Well Shadetree, First Off I'll Bet You A Hundred Bucks You Dont Have, And Never Will Have A Wally, Because If You Did, You Would Be A Better Racer And Sportsman Than Your Reply Shows You Are. Second, Why Dont You Bring Your Cars Up Here To The Mountain And Run Em In The Thin Air, Ill Throw Some More Time In My Throttle Stop To Run Super Street, And We'll See Whos Laughing Through The Traps. My Car Is A Ten Year Old, Mild Steel Chassis Car, A Bit Heavy And Dated Compared To The 1700# Cm S/g Cars That Are Running Up Here, And A 509 At This Alltitude Is Quite Small Compared To The 572's And 632's That Most Of The High Altitude Super Class Racers Are Running. My Motor Is Pretty Maxed Out With The Heads She Has, But I Have A Dyno Sheet To Show 842 Hp At 7400 Rpm, And 696 Ft Lb At 5900 Rpm. Thats At Sea Level Of Course, We Lose About 30-33% Of It At Altitude. So Why Dont You Put Your Money, Or Your Dyno Sheet Where Your Mouth Is, And Learn To Respect Other Peoples Equiptment. Like Your Mom Always Said, If You Dont Have Something Nice To Say, Keep Your Mouth Shut!

Hey Super gas, no sense of humor? MY my, no reason to get all upset. Your right, I have no Dyno sheet, dont need one. You are incorrect about the Wally's. Got FOUR of them and a Divisional Championship a few years back. Wasnt aware of a CM supergass class. CM sounds like comp el. to me. Also wasnt aware of any supergass car weighing 1700lbs. Sounds about 500lbs light to me if i remember my NHRA rules. But what the heck, this is all fun and games, no reason to get your rocker arms in a wad. My mom always said it aint bragging if its true. Mellow dude, its just for fun.

Shadetree, No Hard Feelings, First Off, Congrats On The Wallys, I'll Have My First Soon I Hope, Planning On Attending 3 Div And 2 National Events This Year, Maybe It'll Be My Year. Second, I Was Referring To Chrome Moly When I Wrote Cm, And You Are Close, Sg Weight Is 2100# Except 4 Cyl, Which Is 1200#. I Was Referring To All The Super Class Cars That Have To Add Weight To Make Class, But Take It Off To Bracket Race. Anyway, Are You Doing Any Super Class Or Bracket Racing? I Am Currently Building A 94 2wd S10 For My Wife To Bracket Race This Year. Just A Small Block And A Th350. Try To Get Her In The Mid 12's But Keep It Street Legal. She Wont Drive My Nova, I Sit So Low And Back She Cant See Out Very Well, She Drove Our Friends 72 Nova, 377 And Glide Last Year, She Went 11.98 @ 113mph Her Second Pass, She Didnt Do A Burnout, Didnt Use The Trans Brake, And Didnt Leave On The Converter, But She Had A Blast. So Shes Hooked On Driving Now, Shes Not Content With Helping Me And Running The Weather Anymore. Take Care

I have a Chevy Silverado 2500HD Ext Cab Long bed with the 8.1 V8, and the best I ran was a 15.97 @ 83mph. All I added was a Gen II K&N intake and Magnaflow exhaust.

Hey Andreancic, thats pretty quick for a truck that weighs over 5000lbs. Hope you dropped your tailgate, get that body out of the wind.

It's all in the sig!

who has the fastest street legal car? both on and off slicks.

Well I have run 10:39 and I drive my Mustang to work every day. It is a 72 mile round trip also...

i use to run 13.4s at 109 but i yanked the motor out, i see some of yall go to mir? how often do yall go? ive been goin these past few weeks, and ill be up there this fri, but not im my camaro, ill be racin a bronco

my best run was a 16.2 in a bone stock ford bronco

1988 toyota 22R Carburated, 14.29 all motor and 12.66 w/ nos.

1999 Honda Civic Si completely stock B16A2 engine.
1595 cc 160 hp@7600 revs.

15.37 at sealevel (car and driver tested it at 15.6) but i did some weight reduction and lowered pressure of tires.

16.6 at 5400 ft above sea level.

i would imagine a low 15 in my car :dunno:

Hey, your car's probably about even with mine... but I've definitely got the cool factor over on you...

1963 Ford Galaxie Boxtop w/4bbl 390: Completely untested... *warning! estimated numbers follow*
0-60 in the high 6's or low 7's
1/4 mile in the upper 14's or low 15's (it's an auto trans... calm down)

around 320bhp/400lb-ft. at the wheels (estimate based on stock numbers and what little I've done so far)

the bloody thing weighs about 3900 with no driver... so there's a good chunk of my slow times... but hey, this thing is like 99% stock the way it is... and as soon as I get a job (got one lined up starting in mid-june... I'm about to turn 17 btw) I'm gonna completely work the engine over... replace the cam, piston heads, intake manifold, carb, essentially everything on the motor but the block.

12.73 @ 113 with no traction in first... dire need of slicks! :rolleyes:

1969 Camaro, can see car at www.agbulletracing.com Best run was a 9.12 up until Sunday, then got it down to 9.09 @ 145. In car video of a 9.12 pass will be up shortly. Didn't have the camera in during the 9.09 run. Torque converter blew up 2 runs after the 9.12.

hey quickchange i have a question why does my dads camaro run a 6.89 and yours runs a 6.91 wait a 6.89 is faster than a 6.91 that means you dont have the fastest car on the board

but still anything in the 6's is stupid fast congrats on the time
hey my chevelle with slicks only runs a 9.2 but i hope to beat it this weekend i just gutted it

well anyway nice car

but

hey quickchange i have a question why does my dads camaro run a 6.89 and yours runs a 6.91 wait a 6.89 is faster than a 6.91 that means you dont have the fastest car on the board

but still anything in the 6's is stupid fast congrats on the time
hey my chevelle with slicks only runs a 9.2 but i hope to beat it this weekend i just gutted it

well anyway nice car

but


I'm curious what all is done to your Chevelle to get in the 9s. Maybe 9.20 in the 1/8. It takes a lot more than slicks to make a car fast.

:bs:??????

no it runs a 9.2 on the 1/4
it has a edelbrock 502 board to a 540
it also has a tubro 400 shifter
overdrive system (6 speed with overdrive)
a blower
tubbed tires
nos
and alot more but i dont say

im raceing this weekend and im going to post pics

and ya your right it does take alot more than slicks to run that fast

o ya my dads camaro runs the 6.89 on the 1/4 to

no it runs a 9.2 on the 1/4
it has a edelbrock 502 board to a 540


hummmmm.... well i didnt know why i thought that was strange at first. but i do now. guess what....


EDELBROCK DOES NOT MAKE 502'S

infact, they only make sbc 350's. now would you care to explane this one? anyone else care to have a look.... http://www.edelbrock.com/automotive/index.html
go to the link then select crate engines on the laft side.

no it runs a 9.2 on the 1/4
it has a edelbrock 502 board to a 540
it also has a tubro 400 shifter
overdrive system (6 speed with overdrive)
a blower
tubbed tires
nos
and alot more but i dont say

im raceing this weekend and im going to post pics

and ya your right it does take alot more than slicks to run that fast


I'm going to throw the BS flag again. :bs:

You say in this quote, you have a blower. However, in your pics a couple posts later, there is no blower, unless you don't know what a blower is, which wouldn't surprise me. Also, from your poor wording, they made a Turbo 400 trans, but it was not a 6spd.

lol, lowsonoma, umm... look at the user names agin. the pictures are of my 68 chevelle. i am not the other "68 chevelle" my name is "68chevelle". there has been lots of confusion ever sence he got on here and people have been starting to think im an ass because of the way he is and they think im him. i dont like it. im not mad at your or anything dont worry im just clarifying for you and anyone else who reads this. check out my post right before yours about his 502 though. its cant be so. read his other posts too. as far as you calling BS on him though it still stands true as far as im concerned. just the pictures are of my car and on my sig not his.

like i said befor

it is CUSTOM MADE MY EDELBROCK
they dont sell theese motors in stores and you cant by them

they specialally made it to my car

really so if i call them up and ask them to make me a 502 they will... well i think i will go ahead and do that.

like i said on the other topic i am going to put pics of my chevelle befor and after it was street legal

maby... they did for me
but its going to cost you

alot

My bad "68Chevelle" I was wondering why he would be callin himself out on a lie. But I get it now. I think the other one is about 14 years old, and just bored now that school is out for the summer. He joined this forum just a few days ago, and already has over 50 posts.

well we are all still waiting. originaly you said they were being developed and then you said you would take some this weekend. what happened to the ones being developed? that was days ago. and if you have the money for your car then i would think you have the money for a digital camera so go buy one and take some pics and put them up here now. please

the ones being devoloped are old pics and i had the naggitives lieing around
their of my little bro 2 years ago standing infront of my car with his prom date

again this was 2 years ago it was when my car was street legal

still looks good thogh

the ones being devoloped are old pics and i had the naggitives lieing around
their of my little bro 2 years ago standing infront of my car with his prom date

again this was 2 years ago it was when my car was street legal

oh ok. my bad. i didnt realize they were of your car when you were 16,(your profile says your now 18 for a few more days), of your "little bro" who at the time was probably 15 at the oldest, seing as how you were 16 and he is your little bro, with his prom date. your bro must be good looking to be 15 and have some older girl want to talke him to prom, unless your school lets freshman go to prom. i know my old school didnt unless it was with a junior or senior.

dude do u really think that i spent time doing my profile
i was just filling out the forum as fast as i could
im 23
not 18 and i will be 24 6/24/88
sorry would you like me to change my profile

o ya did u call edelbrock yet

ya you probally did but they said they would make the engine and now your pissy

no actualy im doing what i was asked to do, im not saying anything else bad tword you.

Still waiting for pics from last weekend. We ever going to see them????

On slicks I ran a 11.4 at over 120mph. The <A TITLE="Click for more information about car" STYLE="text-decoration: none; border-bottom: medium solid green;" HREF="http://search.targetwords.com/u.search?x=5977|1||||cars|AA1VDw">car</A>; was having some problems though, probably would have went 11.1 or maybe a 10.99. The ecu was kicking the rev limiter back to 6.5k rpm when it's normally 8.1k rpm. Killed the powerband bad. Shooting for mid to low 10's the beginning to mid season and 9's by the end. This is a street legal car that is driven everday, no trailor queen here. 00 honda civic coupe w/b18c1 turbo, full interior and a cage.

Yeah but its still a civic!!

dad owned a 1968 camaro that went a best of 10.90@? in the late 70's, early 80's, but it blew the converter on that run. On average prob. high 11's low 12's@ about 110.

Grand Prix Turbo (Modded GTP) doing 10.674 @ 129.34 mph (1.672 60') in a 1/4 mile, with a 670hp.

Turbo Grand Prix:
http://www.intense-racing.com/GTP/TurboGP.html

Powered by 3800 FWD engine

I have a Jerry Hass

My best time is 9.08

Monterrey Mexico

9.08? what kind of car?

13.67 1/4 mile @ 99.34 MPH with a 8.8 1/8 mile in a 98 Buick Regal

Best in my Nova N/A on et streets is 11.37 at 117 mph, with 100 hp shot of spray 10.71 at 124. Street tires (non-drag radials) 11.71 at 115.

Firebird's best was 12.89 at 107 on m/t sportsman pros and 13.00 at 106 on stock goodyears.

Truck has run 15.71 at 85 mph, bone stock

Derek

Not as fast as some on here, but not too shabby for a daily driven truck :) 12.12@114.63 That was before the heads & intercooler, last dyno was 432rwhp/422rwtq. Killed the tranny last week tho, new built tranny is going in this week, then we'll see if I can't pull some 11's out of her :biggrin: