Ok what you guys think. For a 1998 Honda Civic EX Coupe, automatic (yea i know what yur thinkin, but its all my parents could get, gosh im only 16 for gosh sakes) a Turbo Charger, or a Super Charger. And we all know that a Turbo is belt driven, and a Super is exhaust driven, so what u guys think would go best??

actually, we all know that a turbo is run by exhaust and the super is belt. personally i like turbos better because of the greater versatility. there are no limits with a turbo, as opposed to a super. i also like the sounds and looks of a turbo.

Originally posted by EXer
Ok what you guys think. For a 1998 Honda Civic EX Coupe, automatic (yea i know what yur thinkin, but its all my parents could get, gosh im only 16 for gosh sakes) a Turbo Charger, or a Super Charger. And we all know that a Turbo is belt driven, and a Super is exhaust driven, so what u guys think would go best??

Back assward on that. I think a belt driven supercharger will be the best bet for a small engine on an civic. You're going to be spending a pretty penny to get either installed.

Sry about bein ass backwards. I think im retarded. Lol

your better off going with and engine swap before you worry about FI.
youll gain pretty much the Same HP but it will be more reliable.:smoka:

maby your parents would like a new 20 yr old son?

maby your parents would like a new 20 yr old son?

Am I missing something?:confused:

I dont get the 20 yr old son thing, but I do want the new RSX engine.