|
|
Front Vs. Rear Locker TestMatt Peckham 07-19-2002, 11:36 AM fascinating results. Do you think you could perhaps expand upon that? OffroadX 07-19-2002, 01:36 PM Huh? Started by Warmonger, 0 replies, only message in the thread is from Matt Peckham. ??? xterrabull 07-19-2002, 01:51 PM I have to agree with Mr. Peckham, the results are fascinating :eek: :eek: :eek: (the results of course being...a thread without an initial post) DeFibVT 07-19-2002, 02:33 PM Ahhhh Bach. Toy Man 07-20-2002, 06:39 PM I PM'd Warmonger on this and he said that he had typed a large writeup but AF 'died' when he tried to send it. However I just got back from a 4x4 101 traing class on the Rubicon that used ARB lockers and we generally used the rear lockers first and the fronts only to get us up some tough ledges. The fronts usually had to be switched immediatly after getting the front tires over so you could turn turn. (This was on a solid surface (granite) - I have been able to turn my ARB's when climbing with the X but that was on loose soils.) On our last really DIFFICULT climb, I thought I had both lockers on but after I got the top, I found out the rear one was off. My tires were slipping about a third of the way up but the fronts eventually caught traction and pulled me up. Toy Man warmonger 07-29-2002, 09:40 PM Originally posted by Matt Peckham fascinating results. Do you think you could perhaps expand upon that? I would love to. Here it is: Amazing, I haven't posted to this board in almost a month and it is almost as good as the last time I posted! :p vBulletin®, Copyright ©2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Automotive Network, Inc., Copyright ©2009
|