Register and join the largest automotive community online!
Google  
Web AF
Please Register or Login to access: DriverSide DriverSide Home | Service & Repair | Car Prices | Parts & Accessories | Reviews & Advice | My Garage

i saw this and i was in shock


Google  
Web AF

Drifty
05-29-2005, 09:36 AM
i was comming from work and i was at a red light then i hear 2 cars reving their motors, i automatically look around me thinking its for me.... no not this time ok whatever. then i see that the light that goes east to west goes green.(im going north) then i see an rx-7(FC model) peel out and take off but i hear no turbo and next to him is a 96 mitsubishi galant with a wing so big it makes the one on my SRT look like it was never there.as they made their way across me i see the galant gets the lead by half a car and keeps pulling on the RX-7 and the last i saw of them racing was the galant put a car on the RX-7

speedthrill
05-29-2005, 09:51 AM
lol, aw he got owned by a ricer. I would like to see the reaction of the rx-7 driver.

Or he didn't went for it like the other one and just cruised along. :tongue:

Muscletang
05-29-2005, 09:58 AM
:lol: :rofl: :lol:

clawhammer
05-29-2005, 10:04 AM
That was great. Did the rx7 blow up, or what?

Pistolpete
05-29-2005, 12:11 PM
maybe the rx7 wasnt racing? lol and the gallent got him real good off the line! nah but ud havta see the look on the 7's owners face!

caviman69
05-29-2005, 12:32 PM
That would have been great to see. I bet you he was pissed.

drewh4386
05-29-2005, 01:49 PM
Ricers owning racers?? Since when? OOOOhh. Maybe they were both ricers o...ok. pheeew.

-The Stig-
05-29-2005, 02:07 PM
Maybe the Rx-7 ran out of turbo?

Gotta fill them up everyonce in a while, just like washer fluid.

This has been a quick tip from RedNeck383:thumbsup:

ac427cpe
05-29-2005, 02:11 PM
FC's aren't all turbos... and they are not really that fast...

KNice96
05-29-2005, 03:51 PM
Since when Rx-7's "are not really that fast..."?

Anyhow, I don't think that the Rx-7 guy was really racing, or maybe he just went easy on the Gallant dude. :dunno:

10sec-Hopeful
05-29-2005, 04:18 PM
Maybe it was one of those newer VR4 Galants? I've heard those things can move decently.

CivRacer95
05-29-2005, 04:29 PM
The RX-7 did peel out. So there's your sign that he was racing. It's not that hard to believe the RX-7 was beat by a Gallant. Especially if it was a non-turbo RX. Geez. It's like OMGZ RX-sevenz CAN't B pwNZd!

Shoite happens. The RX got beat by a ricer. Probably would have been funny to see. But whatev. Funny story.

Twizted_3KGT
05-29-2005, 06:24 PM
yeah fc's arent that fast.

CassiesMan
05-29-2005, 07:06 PM
Since when Rx-7's "are not really that fast..."?


Ever since the non Turbo MkIV Supras weren't all that fast.

97Tsi
05-29-2005, 07:25 PM
Maybe it was one of those newer VR4 Galants? I've heard those things can move decently.

Exactly, maybe it was a modded vr-4. I can see that taking an rx-7. Did you hear a turbo or BOV?

drdisque
05-29-2005, 07:36 PM
stock NA FC's only had 160 hp in a package that wasn't the lightest in the world, I can even see a V6 Galant beating one.

Drifty
05-30-2005, 10:43 AM
Exactly, maybe it was a modded vr-4. I can see that taking an rx-7. Did you hear a turbo or BOV?

Negative Ghostwriter NO BOV from Neither Just burnt tire

Sleepr awd
05-30-2005, 12:18 PM
my friends vr4 doesn't have a BOV sound...just the dump tube and if you listen very closeley, the spooling of a turbo, but its very hard to tell

BlackGT2000
05-30-2005, 03:53 PM
Could be that the Galant was just running properly. We are talking about a 15 year old RX7 that is known to be one of the least reliable cars on the road, its quite likely that it wasn't running corretly. I have seen those old RX7s run and they are usually not that fast anyway, although i have seen some fast ones that were definately not stock. I would definately believe that one of those old RX7s would be beat by a Galant.

drftk1d
05-31-2005, 03:41 AM
i never lost to a galant.

and i have the n/a FC.

stock NA FC's only had 160 hp in a package that wasn't the lightest in the world, I can even see a V6 Galant beating one.

its 160 hp but the weight ranges from 2600 lbs (like mine) to 3000 (for convertable). (note: you can get like 20hp from an exhaust on an n/a with cats removed, its really that restrictive)

all i can say is that i think the galant would have the upper hand if that FC was not running right. honestly the n/a model is not that fast compared to todays cars but we are talking about a car that was considered to have decent performance in 1988, which is slow compared to modern cars. really the race should have been even. sadly its a drivers race. (he must have been a shitty driver because a galant weights 2700 lbs and has 140hp), and to add a side note, there was no 96 galant v6 (and the vr4 was only a 92 model of a different bodystyle).

also might i add the n/a RX-7's are EXTREMELY reliable, the only time i was left stranded on the side of the road was when i ran out of gas (damn gauge wont work). just gotta defend the slow car for now.

Sleepr awd
05-31-2005, 07:01 PM
i guess i missed the 96 part, even so though, 96's have the 4g64 engine (? prety sure) which except for the extra cam is the same as a 4g63 except upped to 2.4 liters so you can turbo one pretty easy (2g turbo parts interchangeable)
the GVR-4's were made in 91 and 92 and both the same body style 2k in 91 and 1k in 92

97Tsi
06-01-2005, 12:37 AM
i guess i missed the 96 part

Same here

street_racer_00
06-03-2005, 12:55 PM
Eh, maybe it's just one of those things you gotta let go with "anything can happen on the street".

Add your comment to this topic!


Google  
Web AF