|
|
Best Cartyphon 12-09-2004, 11:54 AM Considering buying one and doing minor adjustments. Which do you reccommend 1 Toyota Celica GT 2 Acura RSX 3 Honda Civic SI 4 Mitsubishi Eclipse MexSiR 12-09-2004, 04:48 PM Defenitely Acura RSX. Civic Si is very ugly, the eclipse is heavy, and the celica just doesent have balls. None of them have lots of balls but i mean... whtteg 12-09-2004, 05:04 PM Defenitely Acura RSX. Civic Si is very ugly, the eclipse is heavy, and the celica just doesent have balls. None of them have lots of balls but i mean... But you didn't vote. http://www.automotiveforums.com/vbulletin/images/smilies/icon16.gif RSX-S777 12-09-2004, 05:34 PM Need to specify RSX base or Type-S. Assuming Type-S, the RSX gets my vote. I've got a Mitsu Spyder GTS in the family- quick, but quality lacking. I'm not a fan of the Celica at all- in fact, I hate them with a passion. SI is a great car, but Type-S is better. honda4u 12-09-2004, 06:26 PM I think u should get the celica GTS not the GT. The gts has some balls. whtteg 12-09-2004, 07:37 PM In another thread he said it was the non type s RSX. got v-tec? 12-09-2004, 09:15 PM I think u should get the celica GTS not the GT. The gts has some balls. in that case get the rsx type-s wich has bigger balls CaTasHtRoPhE 67 12-09-2004, 09:49 PM Rsx type-S 94PreludeJDM 12-14-2004, 06:25 PM A lot of this depends on the year. I'd take the RSX type S over all of them. Second to that I'd take the Eclipse if it's the GSX, turbo AWD. You can make those things quick as hell. The celica gts has 180hp and 130 ft/lbs torque, way overrated in my opinion. Granted I'm biased, but look at a Prelude! Ace$nyper 12-15-2004, 07:51 PM outta them RSX but i wouldnt pick any of them 95dxcivic 12-15-2004, 10:17 PM i would pick, uummmm, let me see.......... ooh, i know, a 95 dx civic, hold on, thats not a choice huh, i would choose a Si, it's not about the performance for me because all cars can go fast, i like the look of the Si's vBulletin®, Copyright ©2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Automotive Network, Inc., Copyright ©2010
|