i just got back from the tuesday night grudge races and i beat my old time of 14.02 with a 13.79, i have a 01 mustang gt with 3.73 gears, bassini x-pipe with cats, and flowmaster two chamber exhaust, what are some of yall's best times? :naughty:

got any pics of your beast?

i have yet to go to the strip. in due time...........

I won't be able to hit the strip until next summer. But I already got plans to race a buddy of mine thats coming up from LA, he has a gtp.

Raced a 79 Mustang from 1995 to 2000. 351W .030 over, stock block, and crank, 8.5:1 Pistons, Comp Cam, Victor Jr Intake, Holley 700 Double Pumper, Ported Ford DO0E Heads with 1.94/1.60 Manly Pro Flow Valves and Harland Sharp Rockers, running on 93 octane pump gas. C-4 Race Tranny, Reverse Valve Body, with Trans Brake, and a 9" Rearend with a Detroit Locker and 3.89:1 gears. 60' - 1.53, 1/8 mile - 7.43 @ 90, 1/4 mile - 11.89 @ 113

You can't possibly have street tires on that stang to run 13's with that setup, unless you are running at E-Town that is. On the Gtech Pro Competition i've done a 13.2 sec. 1/4 mile at 102 mph. That's with a 1.8 sec. 60'. Before some of the newer mods I ran a 13.6 sec. 1/4 mile at 101 mph against Danno SS.

Raced a 79 Mustang from 1995 to 2000. 351W .030 over, stock block, and crank, 8.5:1 Pistons, Comp Cam, Victor Jr Intake, Holley 700 Double Pumper, Ported Ford DO0E Heads with 1.94/1.60 Manly Pro Flow Valves and Harland Sharp Rockers, running on 93 octane pump gas. C-4 Race Tranny, Reverse Valve Body, with Trans Brake, and a 9" Rearend with a Detroit Locker and 3.89:1 gears. 60' - 1.53, 1/8 mile - 7.43 @ 90, 1/4 mile - 11.89 @ 113


Listing mods is pointless unless you have pics to back it up... in this case, I'm just going to assume that's bs... your profile says you got a Chrysler LHS, and you previously claimed you have an RX7.. now you say you have a stang?

He raced one from 95-00 he didn't say he has one now. And no, pics are not necessary if you know what he's talking about.

I haven't been to the drag strip in a long ass time. The last time I was at the strip was in my red 89 GTC and I managed a 14.6 @ 98 MPH.

Never tested my quarter times. Been to plenty of local drag strips, just haven't done it. I'm guessing I'm running 16's-17's though hah. Eventually I'll get that B20b with Type-R heads and I might do ok. As for now, the car is still stock, so I just haven't done it.

14.7@91 MPH, check sig for car info.

14.2 @ 100.4 with the 5.0L...before the gears...and with no launch.

Listing mods is pointless unless you have pics to back it up... in this case, I'm just going to assume that's bs... your profile says you got a Chrysler LHS, and you previously claimed you have an RX7.. now you say you have a stang?

I do not own the RX-7, I inquired about the Tranny swap for a friend of my son who owns one with a burned up Auto Tranny and wants to put a 5 speed one in it's place. Yes I do own a 1994 Chrysler LHS, I also own a 1989 Dodge Daytona Shelby that my son is driving, and yes I have Drag Raced a 1979 Mustang for 5 years with the mods quoted and have run the times listed and in fact the car is still right down the street under a tarp. Also I do not recall the starter of this thread saying pics were required, only times were asked, also I do not recall seeing anywhere on this forum stating that it was a requirement to list each and every car I own or be labled a bs'r by someone who likes Beefcake (Assuming you do since that is your name). But! just because I'm a nice guy and have been asked for proof, below is a rather blurry pic of me standing with my race car, I'd show you a wheelie shot too but it is copyrighted by the Track Photographer that took it and I only have permission to use it on my web page and nowhere else. And if asked nicely I may provide a link to it but if "Beefy" still thinks I'm full of it then you know what, I really don't give a rats!

http://members.aol.com/PnyRyd9521/myfuncar.jpg

Look close enough and you can make out the numbers "S/S 9521" on the upper left corner of the windshield where S/S stood for "Super Street", Hmmm, isn't that the same number on my nick? Well I'll be!

Now that's proving a point right there. Dont mess with the old timers of AF :iceslolan

Raced a 79 Mustang from 1995 to 2000. 351W .030 over, stock block, and crank, 8.5:1 Pistons, Comp Cam, Victor Jr Intake, Holley 700 Double Pumper, Ported Ford DO0E Heads with 1.94/1.60 Manly Pro Flow Valves and Harland Sharp Rockers, running on 93 octane pump gas. C-4 Race Tranny, Reverse Valve Body, with Trans Brake, and a 9" Rearend with a Detroit Locker and 3.89:1 gears. 60' - 1.53, 1/8 mile - 7.43 @ 90, 1/4 mile - 11.89 @ 113

That's cool man. Your 60 ft. times are as good as mine (car pictured: 406 SBC, stock block, steel crank, 10.5:1 pistons, have no idea what size roller cam it has now, just know its not as good as the one in our other engine, and it's a .640 lift, Victor Jr Intake, Holley Proform 750 cfm, Dart Pro 1 fully cut and race ported heads with filled in chambers (to make up for the flat top pistons), supposedly have 2.20 intake valves/1.60 exhaust-I say supposedly becasue this is what the guy at the shop told us it has, I for one didn't know you could put 2.20s in a small block, but since hte chamber is filled smooth, maybe he changed the valve angles, I was always under the impression that 2.08s were as big as you could go, Powerglyde transmission, .513 Richmond pro gear)

Now I'm not 100% about those heads, becuase long story short, we had a ton of problems with the bottom end of a 406 this shop overhauled for us this winter, so he gave us a short block and charged us for those heads, and they were already on the block, so none of us (my uncle-his car, dad, or me) have actually seen the back side of the heads. So they may or may not be filled in smooth with the exception of a spark plug hole.

Either way, the guy told us there wouldn't be much difference in this engine then the other engine (which has 12.5:1 double hump pistons, 5.7 in. steel rods, Allum. Dart II fully machined heads, 2.05 intake, 1.6125 exhaust valves, .640 roller cam, Holley Proform 850 cfm-also run the 750 sometimes-, victor jr. intake, steel crank), and there is only about a tenth or so difference in 330 ft (that's the distance we race, so i make the assumption that he must be partly telling the truth about the engine! lol).

Anyways, i told ya all of that to say your 60' times are as good as mine, lol, but I run 4.40s in 330 ft, and judging from past times at 1/8th mile tracks, would go 6.70s in the 1/8th.

Edit: I would like to see the link to your site, lol, always like looking at a good wheelie!

I dont know what my quarter mile time my car would get but I'm guessing it would probably be some where in the 18's or 19's. I wanna get my liscence so that I can go run my car at the track.

Ok. So I was wrong.. maybe.. There's just been too many bs'ers lately, and you can't blame me for accusing you at first because all you have is 28 posts. As far as your name and the "number" on the car goes, that doesn't really mean too much, but because I'm a nice guy, I will believe you. Oh btw, I can't even see those 4 numbers with that blurry picture of your's. If you read a few threads down, there was a guy with the name VetteThug(?), he claimed owning a vette, and even posted pictures of "his" ride. Does that mean that was really his car just because he had those 5 letters in his name? No. He was proven to be a bs'er.

And going back to the deal with the RX7, originally in your post, you clearly implied it was YOUR RX7, obviously there is no proof now because you changed your post. I wonder why...

Touche!
Admittadly I did throw in in the word "I" towards the end of the post and yes I edited it. The RX-7 definitely belongs to a friend of my son who is looking to do a tranny swap from auto to 5 speed. My bad on that one. I can understand your thoughts about being a poser and with me being new to this forum I can see your point. I don't want to start anything and I'm sure you really didn't mean no harm. I searched all around the stacks of pics I have for a pic that I have taken that does display the car number rather clearly and here it is.

http://members.aol.com/PnyRyd9521/racecar5.jpg

Anyways, no hard feelings here.

11.78@113 and just to back up my words incase I am doubeted


http://files.automotiveforums.com/gallery/watermark.php?file=/501/87736my_GN.jpg


Hmmm, you know what the messed up thing with the GN's are??? you can't tell if it is a 14 sec stocker or a 10.00 sec fully streat machine beast.

All hail the turbo buick :biggrin:

[QUOTE=BeEfCaKe]There's just been too many bs'ers lately, and you can't blame me for accusing you at first because all you have is 28 posts. QUOTE]

Since when the hell does post count = credibility?

Humm ok I'll play along though not the quickest.

12.01 @ 118 mph. Done on daily used normal radial street tyres. 235x40x17 Federal 595's. Full weight (not stripped of anything)

Mods include:

Exhust, pod filters, boost controller, and a remapped factory ecu. That's all that's been done to the car "so far" :naughty:

BTW Hypsi my burnout is better than yourssssssssss lol :p Too bad it was all show as doing that on street tyres doesn't do any good but add lots of rubber to my guards but was fun as hell hahahahahaha.

http://www.kiwiperformance.co.nz/gtrpics/hugesmoke.jpg

I won't believe you till you post a picture of your car with a cardboard sign that says "AWP9521 ownz joo" I'd hate to see everyone get duped by another turbocharged Echo again. :nono:

[QUOTE=BeEfCaKe]There's just been too many bs'ers lately, and you can't blame me for accusing you at first because all you have is 28 posts. QUOTE]

Since when the hell does post count = credibility?

From that I can tell you're fairly new to the forums without even looking at your post count. If you've been around here for a reasonable amount of time, you'll know that in almost every case(I even dare to say EVERY), where the guy was bsing about a car(be it a turbo echo, a skyline, Lingenfelter vette, etc.), the poster was a newbie. Their whole purpose is to attract attention by "impressing" fellow forum members with their dream rides that they claim to claim. As a result, there is a direct correlation between post count and one's credibility.

In this case, it doesn't apply, AWP9521 has proven himself to be credible.