|
|
Mustang GT 5.0 vs. Thunderbird SC69WiLdcaT 05-28-2004, 11:52 AM yea this is pretty much the same as the last question but i was wondering which of these is fastest, i saw a SC eat a 5.0 up last weekend and i was wondering if that happens alot lol. :smokin: 91_T-Bird_HO_5.0 06-04-2004, 12:55 AM not really, i have a 91 t-bird with a 5.0L it all depends on the driver and what kinda mods they have, i've raced both types of cars and smoked them both, but i do have to say, the SC does have some HP behind it, the mustang does too, but not nearly as much as the SC, now if you was to slap a supercharger on the mustang, it would eat that SC up and spit it back out, the problem with that is or at least it has been for me, it's really hard to find a supercharger for a 5.0L, most of the time i find them for the 4.6L Digital Oxygen 06-13-2004, 04:15 AM Err. Hard to find a Blower for a 5.0? Vortech ATI Kenne Bell Try those guys. I'm sure they would be more than glad to help you out. :D thunderbird muscle 06-30-2004, 01:33 PM It is harder to find a blower for the 4.6 than the 5.0 and that can be done pretty easy. You haven't looked very hard. SC s rule 91_T-Bird_HO_5.0 07-01-2004, 04:29 AM ok, so i was mistaken, i looked on paxtons website and found one, now it's just the $$$ problem, i guess it'll just have to wait a while 93 CAPRICE LTZ 5.7 08-16-2004, 06:31 PM mustang is lighter! Aftermarket parts more avaliable for your pony also! thunderbird is asleeper! they woudn't know hit'em. They'll just see taillights and asphault! more leg room too! vBulletin®, Copyright ©2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Automotive Network, Inc., Copyright ©2009
|