|
|
I was just wondering....str33t_r4c3r 01-03-2002, 09:13 PM What one do you think is better? Sindie 01-03-2002, 09:17 PM 2001 Honda Prelude Avenger:confused: str33t_r4c3r 01-03-2002, 09:20 PM Umm. well this is what i ment Kaneto 01-04-2002, 02:31 AM Wait, what are we rating these cars on. Looks, power, handling, fun, rice-ness, or just overall? Totally disregarding graphics and body kits, stock for stock I'd take the lude... but I'm just a H person in general. Yes, I know the trans am could eat it for lunch. LjasonL 01-04-2002, 02:50 AM okay the prelude is ugly i think, but a trans am is just icky in my opinion, so i say go prelude. yes yes i know the trans am is prob 10 times faster but :apuke: heres how u deal with those :apoke: Kohhal 01-04-2002, 08:20 AM I like the Lude, but mainly cos the "nostrils" on the Trans-Am are :apuke: YogsVR4 01-04-2002, 10:28 AM I've always been a fan of the TA. I always had a soft spot for true muscle cars. blacksnake98 01-04-2002, 11:36 AM My vote goes to the TA. I'd have to lose the purple racing stripes though. str33t_r4c3r 01-04-2002, 03:05 PM Kaneto well the awnser to you'r question is FUN! TatII 02-24-2003, 06:39 AM that prelude seems pretty famous in magazines. i'm not sure if the prelude is any fast. i dotn' see any FIMC so i'm not even sure if its boosted. but i wouldn't say thats a ordinary trans am. judging from the nostrils. it looks like a firebird ram air. i love those cars, but i like them in black. i'm not really feeling them in red though. vBulletin®, Copyright ©2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Automotive Network, Inc., Copyright ©2009
|