SO I AM MAKING A RIGHT ONTO ONE THE MAIN ROADS OUT HERE IN FAIRFIELD CA AND I NOTICED THIS STANG WAS PULLING HELLA HARD FROM BEHIND ME. IT IS A TWO LANE ROAD SO I THOUGHT HE WAS JUST GOING TO FLY RIGHT PASS ME INSTEAD HE RIDES MY ASS SO I JUST SWITCH LANES. HE PULLS UP NEXTY TO ME AND KEEPS REVING. I WAS IN 3RD DOING ABOUT 35- 40 HE DROPS IT AND SO DID I INTO 2ND HE PULLED ON ME MY FRONT BUMPER WAS AT HIS PASSENGER DOOR 3RD GEAR VTEC WOW CAR JUMPS NOW HIS FRONT BUMPER IS AT MY BACK BUMPER I SHUT IT DOWN CAUSE THERE ARE TOO MANY COPS ON THIS STREET. FROM WHAT I COULD TELL HE HAD SOME FLOWMASTERS AND INTAKE YOUR BASIC PARTS THAT MAKE MUSTANG DRIVERS THINK THERE HOT. SO FAR 2 KILLS NOT BAD

DRIVE SAFE EVERYONE :smokin:

looks like your caps lock is broken

Well Mustangs 89 or lesser model. What can I say. As many other american cars they are piece of shit engines. Stock they would be a good match for a civic dx. A civic EX can smoke em real bad when they are stock. A friend of mine who has a silver 89 with nothing done to the motor, it is automatic has raced me when I used to drive a 2001 automatic EX. And he would never jump on me, not even on the start, we both floored it from zero and i would get 4 or 5 cars up to 60 mph. Now that I have my SiR manual I can pull up to 8-9 cars. So pathetic for a 5.0.

I Nknow These Computers At Work Suck Man

I Don't Know How They Make In In Mexico But This One Last Night Was Pretty Fast He Was Manuali Don't Know For Sure If It Was 89 Or What It Did Have The 5.0 Logo On The Side
Hey Mex What Part Of Mexico Are You In I Am Going Out There And Would Like To See What The Races Are Like Hit Me Up Man

i thought you ran 12's.....or 13's isnt that what you said in a previous thread?

The old 5.0 has a hard time breaking 200 at the wheels in a much heavier chassis. I think that run 15+ second ET stock. If your car is really running 12s or 13s then you should have murdered him.

Sorry to thread jack, but Maxspeed have you run your car at the track or on the street? I bet that thing is friggin' fast. Everytime I see you post my jaw just drops when I see what you have done to that thing and the amount of power you have gotten out of it. Those Hp numbers are up there with an E46 SMG, plus you got a lot less weight.

i was hella hesitant to punch it plus my i have no l's and there are hella cops so i just shut it down once i knew i could smoke him

:bs:

Sorry to thread jack, but Maxspeed have you run your car at the track or on the street? I bet that thing is friggin' fast. Everytime I see you post my jaw just drops when I see what you have done to that thing and the amount of power you have gotten out of it. Those Hp numbers are up there with an E46 SMG, plus you got a lot less weight.

I havn't seen lots of track time with it mostly becuase I work way too much and the very few times I bring it down, I end up having problems. The car is pretty quick the way it is now even though it won't rev all they way out. If you were to follow the same plot on the dyno chart, it should make close to 300whp at 8K rpm, but the shitty internal wg keep popping open. I bought a new manifold and external wg but I decided to just wait and put it on the motor we are building now. It will be a fully built b20 with a fully built b16a head. Then the civic will be gutted into a racecar once I get another daily driver.

But in relation to this thread, I wouldn't raise the BD flag. I have seen GSRs take stock 5.0s many times. The old 5.0 fox body is pretty unimpressive stock.

hey max im running a simaler set up and im about to bolt my turbo on and i was woundering what mods do you have and what turbo kit, your runnning a b16 arent you?

hey max im running a simaler set up and im about to bolt my turbo on and i was woundering what mods do you have and what turbo kit, your runnning a b16 arent you?

Bone stock b16a with a 18g turbo.

i was hella hesitant to punch it plus my i have no l's and there are hella cops so i just shut it down once i knew i could smoke him

huh? no l's?.... :eek7:

beating a stock 80's 5.0 is like winning a spelling be against a handicapped kid.... even if you win, your still retarded.

beating a stock 80's 5.0 is like winning a spelling be against a handicapped kid.... even if you win, your still retarded.
Woah, WTF are you? :eek:



SAME SIG!! :bananasmi

Well Mustangs 89 or lesser model. What can I say. As many other american cars they are piece of shit engines. Stock they would be a good match for a civic dx. A civic EX can smoke em real bad when they are stock. A friend of mine who has a silver 89 with nothing done to the motor, it is automatic has raced me when I used to drive a 2001 automatic EX. And he would never jump on me, not even on the start, we both floored it from zero and i would get 4 or 5 cars up to 60 mph. Now that I have my SiR manual I can pull up to 8-9 cars. So pathetic for a 5.0.
Yeah those 5.0s are pieces of shit. Come on seriously, Whats so impressive about running 12s with $5000 including car? :rolleyes:

maybe they gave mexico shitty 5.0's or something..

Yeah those 5.0s are pieces of shit. Come on seriously, Whats so impressive about running 12s with $5000 including car? :rolleyes:

I am pretty sure he was referring to the STOCK 5.0s yes which are slow a hell.

You are right about one thing, the fox body 5.0 stangs are cheap now just to buy them and can be made to run respectable times with a small amount of money just like alot of v8's.

Yeah those 5.0s are pieces of shit. Come on seriously, Whats so impressive about running 12s with $5000 including car?

Sarcasm right?
BTW i have a truck running 12's with aqbout $3800
and its almost 60 years old. My other vehicle supposedly runs 11's i bought it for 1200
Woah, WTF are you? :eek:

SAME SIG!! :bananasmi

I am 2000silverao6.0! cool place!

Sarcasm right?
BTW i have a truck running 12's with aqbout $3800
and its almost 60 years old. My other vehicle supposedly runs 11's i bought it for 1200


I am 2000silverao6.0! cool place!
Greetings.... Im sure you know who I am over there. If not Im in charge of the Discussion area. :)




&
maxspeedhonda (http://www.automotiveforums.com/vbulletin/member.php?u=49591) I know. I shouldnt have posted what I felt but come on... Calling it a POS motor? I dunno about that.

BTW, you got a badass looking car mang. :)

Greetings.... Im sure you know who I am over there. If not Im in charge of the Discussion area. :)




&
maxspeedhonda (http://www.automotiveforums.com/vbulletin/member.php?u=49591) I know. I shouldnt have posted what I felt but come on... Calling it a POS motor? I dunno about that.

BTW, you got a badass looking car mang. :)

Thanks

You are right, calling that motor a POS is a very biased, un-educated statement. Ford didn’t make it very aggressive out of the factory, but they left a hell of a lot of room for improvement. I have lots of buddies making serious amounts of power on the stock 5.0 block. Just the other day at work I was walking past some of the “import posers” (you know the people who don’t know their elbow from their ass but all claim to run <12’s) Anyways, I heard the comment “all domestics are pieces of crap” I stopped and turned around to see a kid I recongnize that drives a rsx type S (a very high 15 sec one at that), I said to him.. Are you fucking retarded, there are about 1000 bone stock GTs in this town that would walk all over your “modded” rsx all day. Needless to say, he shut his mouth.

I was talking about STOCK 5.0 89s, weather you want to admit it or you dont, stock those engines are very SHITTY. Its a 5.0 v8 and most 4 cylinder NA cars can take it stock for stock. Ive driven it, its pathetic, my friend admits it.

I was talking about STOCK 5.0 89s, weather you want to admit it or you dont, stock those engines are very SHITTY. Its a 5.0 v8 and most 4 cylinder NA cars can take it stock for stock. Ive driven it, its pathetic, my friend admits it.

I am pretty sure that NOBODY said that the old stock 5.0's were fast. It is common knowledge that those cars are slow. Go race a 2000+ 4.6 GT, it will more than likely eat you stock. Speaking for the old mustangs, a friend of mine has a late 80's early 90's 5.0. All he has is a intake, exhuast, a 65 shot, and some slicks. I have seem this car run 12's all day. The total of the car when he bought it plus the mods is was like 3K.

I was talking about STOCK 5.0 89s, weather you want to admit it or you dont, stock those engines are very SHITTY. Its a 5.0 v8 and most 4 cylinder NA cars can take it stock for stock. Ive driven it, its pathetic, my friend admits it.

MOST 4-cylinder N/A cars can take it??? Uh, I don't think even in Mexico that that is true, unless your buddy's 5.0 is running on cooking oil, and/or only has three working cylinders.

I havn't seen lots of track time with it mostly becuase I work way too much and the very few times I bring it down, I end up having problems. The car is pretty quick the way it is now even though it won't rev all they way out. If you were to follow the same plot on the dyno chart, it should make close to 300whp at 8K rpm, but the shitty internal wg keep popping open. I bought a new manifold and external wg but I decided to just wait and put it on the motor we are building now. It will be a fully built b20 with a fully built b16a head. Then the civic will be gutted into a racecar once I get another daily driver.

But in relation to this thread, I wouldn't raise the BD flag. I have seen GSRs take stock 5.0s many times. The old 5.0 fox body is pretty unimpressive stock.

Just curious but how are you going to address the sleeves issue with the B20. I know you're not keeping them stock, but I'm just curious. Sorry for the OT.

To keep my post on topic...
I thought that the 89s had the roller motor in them. Isn't it rated at 225hp? I don't know much about them, you'll have to forgive me. Either way you still beat a 5.0 (unless you're lying). They aren't exactly fast, but it's an accomplishment.

Just curious but how are you going to address the sleeves issue with the B20. I know you're not keeping them stock, but I'm just curious. Sorry for the OT.

What do you mean how am I going to address the sleeves? I am going to send the block out to get sleeved and assembled. I don't have all the specifics yet, but I do know that I want to run at least a 10:1 CR.

I don't know what I was asking. I was suffering sleep deprevation and I was horribly sick... and at work. When I read the post I was thinking "the b20 blocks are weak in that area" and I just started typing crap.

beating a stock 80's 5.0 is like winning a spelling be against a handicapped kid.... even if you win, your still retarded.

Sorry but this gave me a lil giggle...Not that the actual statement/saying is funny ( I thought it was '...is like competing in the special olympics...' regardless I just found it humorous how he misspelled 'be'

Hey Olympic retards are OUR Heroes!!!


GO USA!!!

Well, carnnut, about the "most 4cyl NA engines can beat a 5.0 stang", im not lying man, ive never lyied on this forum and never will. The thing is, he has raced against a chevrolet "chevy" (thats the name for the car) which has a 1.6 liter engine producing 85 hp, and those are a match for him. I know the chevys (economy car found in mexico, around 8,000 dollars) are very slow, thats why i made the comparison. His engine might be a little messed up, who knows but ive driven it man.

Well, carnnut, about the "most 4cyl NA engines can beat a 5.0 stang", im not lying man, ive never lyied on this forum and never will. The thing is, he has raced against a chevrolet "chevy" (thats the name for the car) which has a 1.6 liter engine producing 85 hp, and those are a match for him. I know the chevys (economy car found in mexico, around 8,000 dollars) are very slow, thats why i made the comparison. His engine might be a little messed up, who knows but ive driven it man.

Maybe his 5.0, but in general, most 5.0's will be faster than most 4-cylinder cars.

A car thats making 85 bhp is beating a car thats making a little over 200 bhp??

Are you sure he doesnt have the four banger engine sitting inside his Stang? :dunno:

A car thats making 85 bhp is beating a car thats making a little over 200 bhp??

Are you sure he doesnt have the four banger engine sitting inside his Stang? :dunno:

DkShadow might be onto something. It sounds as if this Mustang is a 2.3L I-4 with 5.0 badging or the Mustang engine has serious compression issues. Either way, it sounds as if this Mustang is a hoopty that needs some T.L.C.

DkShadow might be onto something. It sounds as if this Mustang is a 2.3L I-4 with 5.0 badging or the Mustang engine has serious compression issues. Either way, it sounds as if this Mustang is a hoopty that needs some T.L.C.


I wonder about it havin a 4cyl too, I have a 92' Lincoln MarkVII and it has the very same 5.0L HO V8 as the stangs of that same year, not to brag or anything but i havent lost a race to a 4cyl yet, and why should I with twice the cylinders and almost twice the power?

i have a buddy with a 2.3L mustang, he spanked the shyt outta me last night, pulled cars on me that thing is badass









oh yea its turbo :) 2.3L turbo coupe motor in a notchback t3/t4, bus intercooler

i have a buddy with a 2.3L mustang, he spanked the shyt outta me last night, pulled cars on me that thing is badass









oh yea its turbo :) 2.3L turbo coupe motor in a notchback t3/t4, bus intercooler
Those SVO Mustangs kick ass. I want one! :worshippy:

nope not an svo.... was once a regular 4 cyl mustang

he took the motor out of his turbo coupe and threw it in the mustang ill need to get pics or something that thing is a monster

he ran a 14.6 untuned, broken boost controler and on some old ass tires he got out of the tire bin at his work so it would pass inspection

hes waiting on parts so he can convert to 5 lug and throw on his cobra wheels

What do you mean stock 5.0's are slow as hell? By this your mean all of them are slow regardless off year and if they are H.O? I believe a stock 93 GT goes 0-60 in 6.5 seconds. A stock '93 cobra will go 0-60 in about 5.5 seconds. Thats pretty fast stock, especially because all that low end torque means you are always on the power-band.

His IS a 5.0 liter Im sure. Ive raced other mustangs, stock for stock I take them. The Mustang Gt 98 or lower is a good match for me, and I can take them, even if theyre 4.8 liters...theyre all automatic here so its a pretty even race, mustangs from before that version are slow slow stock.

What do you mean stock 5.0's are slow as hell? By this your mean all of them are slow regardless off year and if they are H.O? I believe a stock 93 GT goes 0-60 in 6.5 seconds. A stock '93 cobra will go 0-60 in about 5.5 seconds. Thats pretty fast stock, especially because all that low end torque means you are always on the power-band.
This post is three months old and I don't ever see the thread starter on here anymore..

Good thing this is an old thread or I would have to actually go off on all the shit that is wrong in this thread.