|
|
95 mazda millenia vs 9? honda accordjdmhotrod 01-21-2004, 03:29 PM whitch do you guys think is a better all around car? i own a 99 honda accord and a 95 mazda millenia. but which do you guys prefer? Robert. BMW_4.4i 01-21-2004, 05:10 PM I would probably take the Honda, just because it is a Honda, not because it is newer. Honda's are great cars, but i have also driven Mazda's that are very nice. Jimster 01-21-2004, 05:16 PM The Sixth Generation Accord is possiby one of the most boring, uninspiring cars ever. The Millenia on the other hand (If it is a Miller-Cycle engine) is a techno marvel :) BMW_4.4i 01-21-2004, 05:20 PM Yeah, it may be uninspiring, but it is reliable and a great driver. The Millenia does look nicer. The new 2003 and 2004 Accords look REALLY NICE. For a $20000 - $30000 car, it really rocks! Jimster 01-21-2004, 05:43 PM Yeah, but it's nowhere near as awesome as the Euro Accord/Acura TSX :) BMW_4.4i 01-21-2004, 06:21 PM True. BTW: Sorry, I had to steal your line. (See Signature) :smile: jdmhotrod 01-22-2004, 07:52 AM in my opinion my millenia is much nicer and faster than my accord. my accord is the 2.2 4 cylinder. and my millenia has the quad cam 2.5 v6 whitch is much more powerful than i expected when i bought it. and i paid $3500 for the mazda and $22,000 for the accord used. BMW_4.4i 01-22-2004, 04:55 PM I have never driven a Millenia to an extent. I drove one a year or two ago, but it was a base, base model. You may be right; with the larger engine it may be a nicer car overall than the Accord. I guess it is just your opinion. vBulletin®, Copyright ©2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Automotive Network, Inc., Copyright ©2010
|