|
|
U.S. drops Daisy Cutter bombkris 12-10-2001, 06:45 PM Read it here. (http://www.mycfnow.com/sh/news/stories/nat-news-111428220011210-071233.html) The BLU-82 is that big fucking bomb depicted in the movie outbreak. Here is a pretty cool flash site about the bomb The Daisy Cutter (http://www.guardian.co.uk/flash/0,5860,588916,00.html) Its the largest bomb we have other than a nuke. MSRP: $27,318 http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/dumb/blu-82-riders.jpg Marc04 12-13-2001, 11:58 PM isn't that the 15,000 lbs one..god my teacher was saying something about that today. something like it is so BIG that they have to push it out of the back of a transport plane 1989 DX R 12-17-2001, 10:18 PM Hells yeah! Just like Dr. Strangelove baby! *waving 10-gallon hat wildly* "WAAAAAHAHHOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!" its a texas thing taranaki 12-18-2001, 07:54 PM Originally posted by kbslacker Read it here. (http://www.mycfnow.com/sh/news/stories/nat-news-111428220011210-071233.html) The BLU-82 is that big fucking bomb depicted in the movie outbreak. MSRP: $27,318 Hmmm,$27,318. Does that include delivery? What about air points? Actually, it's a surprise present for someone.Can he bring it back if he doesn't like it? :flipa: eat lead,osama:flipa: soon:flipa: RevHappy CowgirlŪ 12-23-2001, 06:58 PM The BLU-82 is a 15,000-pound bomb that is the size of a Volkswagen Beetle It's got the price tag of a VW Beetle too... Originally posted by kbslacker MSRP: $27,318 :eek: taranaki 12-23-2001, 07:39 PM But nobody wants to shove a beetle up Osama's butt. Steel 12-24-2001, 04:34 PM 27k is really cheap for a bomb nubiannupe 12-24-2001, 05:12 PM Yeah, Steel. But that's just the MSRP. That doesn't factor in destination, dealer prep, tax and title fees! :frog: Chris 06-21-2002, 12:57 PM There have been bigger bombs. The Grand Slam bomb in WWII, carried by Lancasters to attact sub pens and the Tirpitz, as well as the occasional 'ordinary' raid, was a 22000lb SOB. It was carried underneath the plane, because it wasn't practical to put it inside (to make the bombbay doors that big would make the plane unstable). Granted, the chemistry back then isn't as good now, so this daisy cutter is more powerful, but not heavier. also, in WWII, the Americans made a 35000lb bomb to be carried by the B29 Superfortress, but they were never used operationally. PS Its worth noting that the Landcaster is British and was capable of barrell rolls and such while fully loaded:eek: Try that with your fancy cargo plane:D sarujin 06-21-2002, 06:36 PM Yeah its the daisy-cutter which they push out the back of a C-130 Hercules, (us kiwis could even drop one). Its also the most powerful bomb (at the moment) that is non-nuclear. It explodes as it falls, and sprays volitale petrol everywhere, then as it begins to hit the ground it ignites itself!! Thus a huge firebomb is formed, and it sucks oxygen out of everywhere, including Osamas Caves :D sarujin V.S. 07-08-2002, 12:57 AM Originally posted by Chris PS Its worth noting that the Landcaster is British and was capable of barrell rolls and such while fully loaded:eek: Try that with your fancy cargo plane:D yeah, and how many pounds of bombs was the Landcaster carrying while full loaded?;) Chris 07-09-2002, 12:15 AM Originally posted by V.S. yeah, and how many pounds of bombs was the Landcaster carrying while full loaded?;) Fully loaded: 14000lbs of bombs internally, or the 22000lb "Grand Slam" slung underneath.:D Moppie 07-09-2002, 04:26 AM Originally posted by Chris Try that with your fancy cargo plane:D Actualy a C130 will turn in a tighter radias than a Spitfire, and has a higher roll rate. :D Try that in your old 40's bomber. Chris 07-09-2002, 09:46 PM Unfortunately, I don't have a Lancaster to fly against a C130, as Lancasters are rather rare and expensive. :flipa: but I've never heard or a Herculer do a barrel roll:rolleyes: V.S. 07-13-2002, 01:57 AM Originally posted by Chris Fully loaded: 14000lbs of bombs internally, or the 22000lb "Grand Slam" slung underneath.:D I was trying to bring up the difference in max payloads between the Lancaster and the C-130 to counteract your (good natured) bragging. Just for the sake of this post i looked it up, and the "fancy cargo plane" can carry 42,580 lbs. Granted that's not worth mentioning considering the age difference, but I assume the ability to do barrel rolls doesn't scale up well along with the size of the aircraft. Lets just forget these posts of mine, because i probably had a joke in the back of my mind when I first posted, but its gone. I really need to stop typing after midnight. vBulletin®, Copyright ©2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Automotive Network, Inc., Copyright ©2009
|